PeraPlay.PH TODAY
PeraPlay.PH Bury
Date: 2024-04-25 12:44:18 | Author: PeraPlay.PH | Views: 94865 |
Bury
-
The UK government has been urged to prohibit and phase out state ownership of football clubs, in a letter written to sports minister Lucy Frazer by human rights group Fair Square Heu
Only autocratic states, with power and wealth concentrated in the hands of unaccountable individuals, are able to sanction the use of sovereign wealth to finance football clubs Superace
They use force arbitrarily and often violently to establish and maintain power domestically and to wage war abroad, and they have the capacity to dispose of vast sovereign wealth without any oversight or transparency Cashback
It is stressed that the stability for the game called for by the government’s recent white paper on the future of football simply isn’t possible with the current involvement of states like the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, as the non-profit body raise questions as to why it was not included in the document Panalo
Their primary motivation for controlling football clubs is typically for the reputational benefits that can accrue.”
Their involvement in football leaves the Premier League inextricably entwined with, and exposed to, developments in the UK’s foreign policy Jili
Autocratic states abuse their sovereign powers in various harmful ways Dais
FairSquare lays out why state ownership is “the greatest threat to the sustainability, integrity, and vitality of football in England and beyond” before calling on the government to “protect” clubs and the game with rules that “dissuade states or their proxies from even attempting to take ownership of clubs”.The letter reads: “We are seriously concerned that there is no reference to state ownership of football clubs and that a proposed ‘fitness and propriety test’ adjudges suitability for stewardship of a club to be based solely on an individual’s ‘integrity, honesty, financial soundness, and competence’, and takes no account of whether a prospective owner is acting in the political interests of a state.”Fair Square, a non-profit research group which works on accountability in sport and the impacts of authoritarianism in the Gulf states, then succinctly explains why state ownership presents such a threat.“The arguments against allowing states to control football clubs ought to be self-evident, and result from the powers they can exercise Bet88
It is stressed that the stability for the game called for by the government’s recent white paper on the future of football simply isn’t possible with the current involvement of states like the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, as the non-profit body raise questions as to why it was not included in the document PUBG
Their primary motivation for controlling football clubs is typically for the reputational benefits that can accrue.” Dumaguete
Autocratic states abuse their sovereign powers in various harmful ways Roulette
Only autocratic states, with power and wealth concentrated in the hands of unaccountable individuals, are able to sanction the use of sovereign wealth to finance football clubs Paymaya
Their involvement in football leaves the Premier League inextricably entwined with, and exposed to, developments in the UK’s foreign policy Freerolls
The UK government has been urged to prohibit and phase out state ownership of football clubs, in a letter written to sports minister Lucy Frazer by human rights group Fair Square
FairSquare lays out why state ownership is “the greatest threat to the sustainability, integrity, and vitality of football in England and beyond” before calling on the government to “protect” clubs and the game with rules that “dissuade states or their proxies from even attempting to take ownership of clubs”.The letter reads: “We are seriously concerned that there is no reference to state ownership of football clubs and that a proposed ‘fitness and propriety test’ adjudges suitability for stewardship of a club to be based solely on an individual’s ‘integrity, honesty, financial soundness, and competence’, and takes no account of whether a prospective owner is acting in the political interests of a state.”Fair Square, a non-profit research group which works on accountability in sport and the impacts of authoritarianism in the Gulf states, then succinctly explains why state ownership presents such a threat.“The arguments against allowing states to control football clubs ought to be self-evident, and result from the powers they can exercise Rng
They use force arbitrarily and often violently to establish and maintain power domestically and to wage war abroad, and they have the capacity to dispose of vast sovereign wealth without any oversight or transparency Casinoin