Jude Bellingham has questioned the decision to allow Kai Havertz to re-take a crucial penalty in Chelsea’s Champions League win over Borussia Dortmund.Graham Potter’s side progressed 2-1 on aggregate after a 2-0 second leg win at Stamford Bridge.Havertz’s penalty, after Marius Wolf was deemed to have handled, proved decisive as Dortmund exited at the last-16 stage.The intervention of the video assistant referee that led Chelsea to be awarded a penalty prompted protests from the visiting players, who were further riled when Havertz was allowed to take again having struck the post with his initial spot-kick.Bellingham believes that ruling that Dortmund’s players had encroached into the box before the kick had been taken was a “joke” of a decision. 188bet
Jude Bellingham has questioned the decision to allow Kai Havertz to re-take a crucial penalty in Chelsea’s Champions League win over Borussia Dortmund.Graham Potter’s side progressed 2-1 on aggregate after a 2-0 second leg win at Stamford Bridge.Havertz’s penalty, after Marius Wolf was deemed to have handled, proved decisive as Dortmund exited at the last-16 stage.The intervention of the video assistant referee that led Chelsea to be awarded a penalty prompted protests from the visiting players, who were further riled when Havertz was allowed to take again having struck the post with his initial spot-kick.Bellingham believes that ruling that Dortmund’s players had encroached into the box before the kick had been taken was a “joke” of a decision. Bigwin